Growing geopolitical tensions have reignited debate around the World Cup 2026, with German football executive Oke Göttlich urging Europe to openly discuss whether participation should be reconsidered. His concerns focus on the international conduct of U.S. President Donald Trump, raising broader questions about ethics, politics and football’s global responsibility.
Göttlich, president of FC St. Pauli and vice‑president of the German Football Association (DFB), shared his views in an interview with Hamburger Morgenpost. He argued that the time has come for Europe to seriously evaluate the implications of competing in a tournament so closely linked to current political tensions.
Political Tensions Surrounding the World Cup 2026
Göttlich’s remarks come amid heightened friction between the United States and Europe. Recent controversies — including proposals to purchase Greenland and tariff threats against European nations — have intensified diplomatic strain. Drawing historical parallels, he referenced the 1980 Olympic boycott, when several nations withdrew in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. In his view, today’s global climate may present even greater cause for concern.
FIFA’s Approach to Political Issues
Göttlich also questioned what he sees as FIFA’s inconsistent stance on political matters. He pointed to the scrutiny surrounding the 2022 Qatar World Cup, where human rights and political debates dominated global discussion. His concern is that football cannot selectively decide when politics matter. This raises a broader question within the sport: does neutrality protect football, or does it enable harmful political behavior?
For additional context on FIFA’s governance, readers can refer to BBC Sport, which regularly covers global football policy and governance issues.
Europe’s Divided Response
While Göttlich’s call has sparked conversation, European governments and football bodies remain divided. France’s sports minister dismissed the idea of a boycott, insisting that sport should remain separate from politics. The Danish Football Association acknowledged the sensitivity of the issue but did not endorse a boycott. Denmark, still navigating qualification play‑offs, remains focused on securing its place at the tournament.
Hosting Structure and Ethical Concerns
The United States, Canada and Mexico will jointly host the 2026 tournament, and the U.S. will stage 78 of the 104 matches. This dominant American role fuels Göttlich’s concerns, as he argues that Europe must confront the political responsibility tied to the event. He dismisses claims that a boycott would unfairly punish players and insists that the lives of people affected by geopolitical conflict deserve equal consideration.
A Call for Ethical Leadership in Football
Göttlich concluded by challenging football leaders — including DFB president Bernd Neuendorf and FIFA president Gianni Infantino — to clarify where they draw ethical boundaries. His message underscores a growing sentiment: football cannot isolate itself from global events, and the World Cup 2026 may force Europe to confront difficult moral questions.
